ACCOUNT

log reg

 

ACCOUNT     log reg

depart-education-large.png

Following changes to the definition of regulated activity introduced on 1 September 2026, many schools have contacted the Independent Safeguarding Service (ISS) seeking clarification about the implications for sixth-form students, prefects and other pupils who volunteer to support younger children.

We are therefore pleased to share an important legal briefing from our partners at HCR Law, who provide legal oversight and support in the development of ISS safeguarding policies and procedures.

Working alongside the Independent Schools Council (ISC), HCR Law has sought clarification directly from the Department for Education (DfE) about the continued application of the peer exemption, following the removal of the supervision exemption under the Crime and Policing Act 2026.

The DfE has now provided further clarification, including correspondence dated 23 September and 9 October 2026.

What has changed?

From 1 September 2026, the supervision exemption was removed from the definition of regulated activity. Previously, certain volunteers working under supervision could fall outside regulated activity and therefore not require an enhanced DBS check with children's barred list information.

The removal of this exemption raised questions about whether older pupils helping younger children, including within Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) provision, would now require DBS checks.

However, a separate provision within the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, known as the peer exemption, remains in force.

What has the DfE clarified?

The DfE has confirmed that the peer exemption can continue to apply to sixth-form students and other pupils volunteering with younger children within the same school.

This includes pupils supporting children in different year groups or at different sites operating as part of the same school.

Where the exemption applies, the pupil is not considered to be undertaking regulated activity solely because they are assisting a member of staff who is in regulated activity. Consequently, an enhanced DBS check with children's barred list information is not required on that basis.

Importantly, the exemption is not automatic.

The pupil must genuinely be acting under the direction of someone undertaking regulated activity, and the arrangements must satisfy the conditions of the peer exemption.

The DfE has also indicated that the exemption may extend to certain established school partnerships or organised group activities, although this requires careful consideration of the circumstances.

What should schools do?

HCR Law recommends that schools review their existing pupil volunteering arrangements and ensure that they can demonstrate why the peer exemption applies.

In particular, schools should:

  • Review arrangements involving sixth-form students, prefects and other pupils supporting younger children.

  • Ensure that pupils are working under the direction of an appropriate member of staff undertaking regulated activity.

  • Undertake and record a proportionate risk assessment, ideally led by the Designated Safeguarding Lead (DSL).

  • Maintain appropriate records of pupil volunteering arrangements, including the supervision and direction provided.

  • Consider whether existing arrangements fall within the peer exemption, particularly where pupils support children at another school or within a school partnership.

Where the peer exemption does not apply, schools must consider whether the activity meets the statutory definition of regulated activity and whether the relevant DBS and barred list checks are required.

Further guidance from HCR Law

HCR Law's briefing provides a detailed legal analysis of the peer exemption, the DfE's latest clarification and the implications for schools. It also considers work experience placements and the responsibilities of schools and host organisations.

HCR Law is also preparing an FAQ document and flowchart to help schools apply the updated requirements in practice.

This is an area that has generated considerable uncertainty for schools since September, and we are grateful to HCR Law for allowing us to share their expertise and analysis with our members.

HCR Law is one of ISS's specialist partners, providing legal expertise and oversight to support the accuracy and currency of our safeguarding policies and procedures.

We encourage schools to read HCR Law's full briefing, particularly where they currently use older pupils to support younger children or operate volunteering arrangements across different schools or sites which can be found here.

InfoSharing.jpg

New statutory information sharing duty: what organisations need to know

The government has published new statutory guidance on sharing information to safeguard children and young people.

The guidance, published on 10 September 2026, explains the new information sharing duty introduced through section 16LA of the Children Act 2004. The duty comes into force on 30 September 2026 and applies to a range of safeguarding organisations, including education and early years agencies, local authorities, health services, the police and other specified organisations.

It replaces the previous non-statutory Information sharing: advice for practitioners providing safeguarding services.

What is changing?

The new duty is intended to remove uncertainty about whether information can be shared, particularly where concerns relate to emerging needs, early help or a child’s wider welfare rather than an immediate risk of significant harm.

There is no requirement for a child to have reached a particular statutory threshold before relevant information can be shared.

From 30 September 2026, an organisation covered by the duty must share information with another organisation covered by the duty where:

  • it holds information about a child, or another person connected to that child;
  • it considers the information relevant to safeguarding or promoting the child’s welfare; and
  • it considers that sharing the information may help the recipient assess need or risk, make a decision, provide support or take safeguarding action.

The duty applies both when an organisation identifies relevant information itself and when it receives a request for relevant information from another organisation covered by the legislation.

Must share, rather than may share

This represents an important change in emphasis.

Previous guidance focused largely on giving practitioners confidence that the law allowed them to share information. The new legislation creates an express duty to share where the statutory conditions are met.

However, this does not mean that every piece of information must automatically be shared. Practitioners must continue to exercise professional judgement and consider:

  • whether the information is relevant to safeguarding or promoting the child’s welfare;
  • whether sharing it may help the recipient carry out its safeguarding or welfare functions;
  • what information is necessary and proportionate to share;
  • who needs to receive it; and
  • whether sharing would be more detrimental to the child than not sharing.

The final consideration is a specific limitation within the legislation. The guidance describes circumstances in which sharing would be more detrimental to the child than not sharing as extremely limited. A decision not to share on this basis should therefore be rare, carefully considered and clearly recorded.

Consent and working with families

Consent is not normally the appropriate lawful basis for sharing information for safeguarding and welfare purposes.

The new guidance warns against seeking consent where information will be shared regardless of whether permission is given. It describes this as presenting children and families with a “false choice”.

Instead, organisations should identify the appropriate lawful basis from the outset. Practitioners should normally be open and transparent with children and families about:

  • why information is being shared;
  • what information will be shared;
  • who will receive it; and
  • how it may be used.

There will still be circumstances in which informing a parent, carer or another person would be unsafe or inappropriate, including where doing so could increase the risk of harm or undermine safeguarding activity.

It is also important to distinguish between consent to share information and consent to receive a voluntary service. A family may choose whether to engage with services such as Family Help, but their agreement is not required before relevant information is shared where the statutory duty applies.

Early help and emerging concerns

The duty is not limited to child protection concerns or situations in which the section 47 threshold may have been reached.

Relevant information must also be considered for sharing where it may help another organisation:

  • identify emerging needs;
  • understand patterns or accumulating concerns;
  • assess what support a child or family may require;
  • prevent needs from escalating; or
  • promote the child’s welfare.

This is particularly significant for education and early years settings that may previously have been advised not to make an early help referral, or share relevant welfare information, without parental consent.

Confidentiality and data protection

A disclosure made in accordance with section 16LA does not breach an obligation of confidence. Where the duty applies, practitioners do not need to establish that disclosure is justified by an overriding public interest or obtain consent under the common law duty of confidentiality.

Data protection legislation continues to apply. Organisations must still:

  • identify an appropriate lawful basis;
  • share only information that is necessary and proportionate;
  • ensure that information is accurate;
  • share information securely;
  • maintain appropriate records; and
  • be transparent about how personal information may be used.

Data protection should not be treated as a reason to withhold information where the statutory duty applies.

What should organisations do now?

Organisations should prepare for the duty coming into force on 30 September 2026 by:

  • reading and circulating the new statutory guidance;
  • reviewing safeguarding, child protection, early help and information-sharing policies;
  • removing or amending requirements that routinely make parental consent a condition of sharing safeguarding or welfare information;
  • reviewing privacy notices, referral processes and information-sharing agreements;
  • ensuring that staff understand the distinction between consent to share information and consent to receive a service;
  • agreeing how information-sharing decisions and the reasons for them will be recorded;
  • discussing the changes with safeguarding leads, data protection officers and information governance leads; and
  • replacing saved copies of the previous information-sharing advice.

The guidance is accompanied by strategic and operational template data-sharing agreements that organisations and safeguarding partnerships may adapt locally.

The full statutory guidance and accompanying templates are available on the government’s information sharing to safeguard children and young people page.

Support for ISS members

ISS is reviewing its safeguarding policy templates and training materials in light of the new statutory duty. We wll update them and notify you of any changes and to 'recreate' your policies.

Members do not need to interpret the changes alone. We will provide updated policy wording and practical guidance in our training to help organisations understand what the duty means for referrals, consent, recording decisions and day-to-day safeguarding practice.

depart-education-large.png

The Department for Education has today confirmed that Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) 2026 is now in force, replacing the previous 2025 version of the statutory guidance.

The guidance applies to all schools and colleges in England and sets out the legal duties they must follow to safeguard and promote the welfare of children and young people under the age of 18.

Schools and colleges should now ensure that their safeguarding arrangements, policies and staff training reflect the 2026 guidance.

What changes from today?

The final 2026 guidance was published in July, giving schools and colleges time to prepare ahead of its implementation on 1 September 2026.

From today, it is no longer a document for advance planning: KCSIE 2026 is the statutory guidance that schools and colleges must have regard to.

Among the changes for 2026 are updates relating to:

  • safeguarding information for all staff;
  • the removal of the previous shorter version of Part One from Annex A;
  • revised expectations around the transfer and receipt of safeguarding information when children move between schools;
  • racism, faith-targeted abuse and other discriminatory behaviour within safeguarding practice;
  • reasonable force and restrictive interventions;
  • alternative provision;
  • children who are absent from education;
  • online safety, including emerging technology;
  • safer recruitment and regulated activity; and
  • a range of updates reflecting changes to wider statutory guidance and legislation.

A full summary of the changes is provided by the Department for Education within Annex C of KCSIE 2026.

Part One must now be read by all staff

One of the important structural changes for 2026 is the removal of the shorter version of Part One that previously appeared within Annex A.

The Department for Education has confirmed that all staff must now read Part One in full and follow their school or college's safeguarding policies and procedures.

A new Part One – overview for all staff has also been published. This provides a useful quick-reference summary, but the Department for Education is clear that it is complementary to Part One and does not replace it.

Schools should therefore ensure that arrangements for staff induction and safeguarding updates reflect this change.

A further update on regulated activity

The Department for Education has also confirmed today that it has temporarily removed its separate document Regulated activity in relation to children: scope, pending an update.

Schools and colleges should therefore take care that any supporting materials they use concerning regulated activity and safer recruitment reflect the current statutory position.

What do ISS members need to do?

For Independent Safeguarding Service members, much of the work has already been done for you.

Our 2026/27 safeguarding and child protection policy templates have been updated to reflect KCSIE 2026 and the associated statutory changes.

Our safeguarding training has also been updated for the new academic year, so members do not need to work through the guidance independently and determine what each amendment means for practice: the changes are incorporated into our training and resources.

Schools should, however, ensure that:

  • staff receive their appropriate safeguarding update and read Part One of KCSIE 2026;
  • governors and trustees understand the changes relevant to their safeguarding responsibilities;
  • current safeguarding and child protection policies are adopted and made available to staff; and
  • local procedures and school-specific safeguarding arrangements remain accurate.

ISS members can access their updated policies, resources and training through their membership dashboard.

Read KCSIE 2026

The full statutory guidance, Part One and the new Part One overview are available from the Department for Education:

Keeping Children Safe in Education 2026 – GOV.UK

 

dbs-check.jpg

Youth warnings, reprimands and cautions will no longer be automatically disclosed to employers who require Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) certificates from 28 November.

The changes, which come as a result of a Supreme Court judgment that found some elements of the existing filtering rules for Standard and Enhanced DBS checks were disproportionate, are intended to make it easier for people with certain convictions to find employment.

The multiple conviction rule will also be removed, meaning that if an individual has more than one conviction, regardless of offence type or time passed, each conviction will be considered against the remaining rules individually, rather than all being automatically disclosed on the certificate.

Christopher Stacey, co-director of Unlock – a group that campaigns for people with convictions – welcomed the changes, but said they did not go far enough to improve access to work for some people with childhood convictions. 

“The changes coming in on 28 November are a crucial first step towards achieving a fair system that takes a more balanced approach towards disclosing criminal records,” he said. “However, we are still left with a criminal records system where many people with old and minor criminal records are shut out of jobs that they are qualified to do.

“We found that over a five-year period, 380,000 checks contained childhood convictions, with 2,795 checks including convictions from children aged just ten. Many of these childhood convictions will continue to be disclosed despite these changes.

“Reviews by the Law Commission, Justice Select Committee, former Chair of the Youth Justice Board Charlie Taylor and David Lammy MP have all stressed the need to look at the wider disclosure system. The government’s plan for jobs should include a wider review of the criminal records disclosure system to ensure all law-abiding people with criminal records are able to move on into employment and contribute to our economic recovery.”

New DBS guidance advises organisations to update their recruitment processes in light of the changes and check the Ministry of Justice website for which convictions or cautions should be disclosed by job candidates.

It suggests that employers ask job candidates: “Do you have any convictions or cautions (excluding youth cautions, reprimands or warnings) that are not ‘protected’ as defined by the Ministry of Justice?”

It also urged employers to include the following paragraph in their standard job application forms: “The amendments to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) Order 1975 (2013 and 2020) provides that when applying for certain jobs and activities, certain convictions and cautions are considered ‘protected’. This means that they do not need to be disclosed to employers, and if they are disclosed, employers cannot take them into account.”

The guidance says: “Employers can only ask an individual to provide details of convictions and cautions that they are legally entitled to know about.

“If an employer takes into account a conviction or caution that would not have been disclosed, they are acting unlawfully under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974.

“Employers should conduct a case-by-case analysis of any convictions and cautions disclosed and consider how, if at all, they are relevant to the position sought. It would be advisable for the employer to keep records of the reasons for any employment decision (and in particular rejections), including whether any convictions or cautions were taken into account and, if so, why.”

Cedit: Ashley Webber - Personnel Today

SchoolDrugsArrest.jpg

A county lines drug gang forced 40 children to deal cannabis and cocaine at a single school.

The teens, some as young as 14, had been supplied with drugs and dealing kits including deal bags and scales. 

Police say grown-up dealers had a network of 40 pupils dealing at the school which has just over 1,200 pupils - meaning one in thirty was possibly selling drugs.

It is suspected that girls as young as 14 at Kingsdown School in Swindon, Wiltshire, have been pestered for sex in exchange for cocaine.

And the dawn police raid yesterday - on the eve of GCSE results - revealed the extent of the teens coerced into the operation.

Wiltshire Police arrested a 27-year-old man during the raid. He has since been released under investigation.

Sgt Nathan Perry, who planned the 7am raid, said: "We found the person we're looking for, we've managed to safeguard the children who were at risk and we've found drugs.

"We all know about county lines and the risks associated with that.

"The difficulty with this type of drugs operation is that it's specifically targeting very young children in order to get them to deal drugs.

"Some of the information we've been passed is that children are not only being coerced into this activity, but they're also being physically threatened.

"If they go to police or teachers they'll be harmed," he added. 

Police were said to have been alerted to the gang at Kingsdown School.

A pair of older teen boys, both 16, are believed to have been supplying a network of up to 40 children in their mid-teens at the Swindon school.

The 27-year-old was arrested during the morning raid on suspicion of possession of class B drugs with intent to supply and inciting a child to engage in sexual activity.

The raid came as Swindon police focused their sights on modern slavery.

Nationally, police have increasingly turned to modern slavery laws to target drug dealers who force children and vulnerable adults to peddle their product.

Sgt Perry said those convicted could expect sentences of up to 15 years imprisonment.

"You've got children being exploited and young kids being forced to run the drugs. We will take it seriously," he said.

"The sheer nature of the exploitation of these young people is unacceptable.

"If we don't do something to stop that they're potentially going to be at risk for the rest of their lives.

 
"They need that positive engagement and we're not going to be able to do that until we remove their handlers, for want of a better word."
 
If children start becoming more withdrawn, secretive about their possessions and start acquiring cash and expensive clothes without explanation, it could be a sign they are being exploited by the gangs.
 
Article reported by Tom Seaward for the Mirror.

© Copyright . All rights reserved. The Independent Safeguarding Service is a Community Interest Company, registered in England: No 11062624.